Donate online now (to our parent organization) to support our PRA Data Litigation project:
Join our mailing list to receive updates on the California PRA Data Litigation Project.
Public Records Act Data Litigation Project
We are just getting started on a project to compel California public and local agencies to disclose computer data files under the Public Records Act. This is important litigation, because it will determine the rights of California citizens to access computer data kept by state and local governments. The public has already paid, through taxation, for this data. Why should we have to pay again when we want a copy?
Therefore state agencies and local governments should provide copies of their computer data upon request to any member of the public, unless the requested data is subject to one of the express exemptions in the Public Records Act or another statute (e.g. for protection of an individual's privacy). But agencies regularly refuse to provide computer data in response to PRA requests, giving a variety of invalid legal reasons, e.g. "it's computer software" or "the request is burdensome, because it's asking for too much information." They feel free to assert these legal defenses they know to be invalid because they know that few requestors are willing to litigate.
GIS Parcel Data Suits - History
We're starting with GIS parcel data, which is mapping data describing the location of each individual legal parcel of land in each county. The California First Amendment Coalition was a pioneer in this area, with its suit to obtain GIS parcel data from Santa Clara County under the PRA. The resulting California Court of Appeal published opinion created a precedent requiring disclosure of this data under the PRA. The Angeles Chapter of the Sierra Club was next, filing suit against Orange County to obtain the same type of data, after Orange County refused to disclose it. Dean Wallraff, our Executive Director, was heavily involved in this suit as a law clerk working for the Sierra Club's attorneys, Sabrina Venskus and Theresa Labriola. The Sierra Club is currently awaiting the trial-court opinion, and plans to appeal if it loses.
Our Work Obtaining GIS Parcel Data
We are currently in the process of sending demand letters to several other California counties which still charge more for this type of data than the PRA allows and are planning to litigate if our requests are denied, as we expect. This litigation will be very cost-effective, since it will use outside attorneys working on a contingency/pro-bono basis for the attorney's fees the PRA mandates for prevailing plaintiffs. The litigation will be straightforward, using the processes and templates developed in the Sierra Club's suit against Orange County.
Follow-On Litigation to Ensure Public Access to Public Data
Public agencies are keeping more and more public records as data files in computers, yet there are very few published California cases applying the PRA to computer data, even though the act, by its express terms, applies to "information stored in a computer." Most of the legal arguments made by Santa Clara and Orange Counties as to why GIS parcel data should be exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act could be applied to other types of data as well. Assessor's data, electronic accounting data, databases of all sorts, and other types of GIS data are subject to disclosure under the PRA. But public entities won't give up this data without a fight. Our plan for litigation in this area is to expand the case law outward from GIS parcel data to other types of data, so that it is eventually clear that all types of data that don't fall within one of the PRA exemptions -- e.g. protecting individuals' privacy -- must be disclosed to the public.
Please Donate to Support our Work
Achieving our project goal will require a long process with many lawsuits. Litigation in this area is very cost-effective for plaintiffs, since the Public Records Act provides for mandatory attorney's fees for prevailing plaintiffs. That is, if we sue County X to obtain data under the PRA and we win, the county must pay our costs and attorney's fees. Because of this, it is not difficult to find attorneys willing to work on these cases for contingency fees. We still need to pay costs, including filing fees, process server fees, transportation, copying, etc. And we would like to be able to pay staff to send demand letters, manage the process, participate in negotiations, etc.